Friday, February 13, 2009

"The USA Government is corrupt beyond redemption!"

"The USA Government is corrupt beyond redemption!"
The Vice-president Dick Cheney and his created, fabricated, engineered and
completely subservient to CIA2/MOSSAD neo-cons are involved.....
Dick Cheney was the man in full charge...

The anti-Muslim terrorist thugs designed 9/11 to blame it on the
arabs/Muslims to start these middle east wars, police officers/FBI
agents were used in the planning and the execution of the September 11
attacks and that is why it was called 9/11...

The fact is that the 9/11 terror attack were master minded to start the
middle east wars, PNAC put their invasion plans in a document called
"Rebuilding America's Defenses" a year before 9/11, they even mentioned
in it to execute these plans they need a new pearl harbor, these are facts.
Crossing the Rubicon Simplifying the case against Dick Cheney, he is a
member of PNAC.
It is all about the oil and Dick Cheney was involved several years
before 9/11.
Unocal and the Afghanistan pipeline
Is Al Qaeda Fake?

Category: Politics

“In order to rally people, governments need enemies. They want us to be
afraid, to hate, so we will rally behind them. And if they do not have a
real enemy, they will invent one in order to mobilize us.” — Thich Nhat
Hanh - Vietnamese monk, activist and writer.

What if al Qaeda didn’t really exist in 2000 and only exists now because
we have created it? This video segment from “The Power of Nightmares”
was sent to me recently and it reflects something I’ve wondered about
for quite a while. It’s possible bin Laden himself is not a terrorist
leader, since he was originally a creation of the CIA, and that his
“organization” isn’t that at all, but a loosely-connected group of men
who don’t even share a common purpose.

What if Al Qaeda is as fake an excuse for the so-called “war on terror”
as the WMDs were?
According to this video, “Al Qaeda Doesn’t Exist”,
bin Laden had no formal organization until we invented it for him after
September 11, 2001, though he had a small group of followers before that.
According to the video, in January, 2001, a trial began in a Manhattan
courtroom for the four men accused of the embassy bombings in Africa.
The Americans decided to prosecute bin Laden for crimes under this
specific trial. To do this, prosecutors needed evidence of a criminal
organization, like the Mafia. This was provided for the authorities by a
key prosecution witness name Jamal, highly paid, and his account is what
the case for the existence of al Qaeda is based on.
It fit exisitng laws to prosecute bin Laden with being the head of ann
organization. In other words, a paid witness for the prosecution
single-handedly reinforced the bin Laden myth at the urging of
prosecuting attornies He claimsed that bin laden headed this group known
as “the base”. The reality is that a loose association of Islamic
militants were mostly planning their own operations that were funded by
bin Ldaen. He wasn’t their commander. He didn’t use ‘al Qaeda’ as an
organization until after 9/11 when he found out that Americans had used
the phrase “al Qaeda”.

After the U.S. then supposedly created al Qaeda, our government went on
to create the ‘war on terror’. However, it’s all been made up by the
U.S. government, since the beginning. Robert Sheer wrote about this in
the LA Times in January 2005 after viewing the documentary The Power of
His article, titled “Is Al Qaeda Just Bush Bogeyman?” makes some
excellent points.
According to, they ask,

“Stop and think for a minute. Do the acts of terror accomplish
anything for the group that is blamed for the terror? Does terror
achieve their ends or obtain the results they want? Or isn’t it obvious
that the acts of terror are actually achieving the objectives of those
who claim to be the victims of the terror, to gain them sympathy and
political alliances?

History is full of rulers who used fake terror on their own
populations to create consent for their policies. The US is known to
have actually planned fake terror to create support for an invasion of
Cuba. And, it is now well established that FDR not only allowed the
attack on Pearl Harbor to happen, but goaded the Japanese into it to get
a reluctant US into WWII.

Check out this site for more background on this and other stories of how
the U.S. government has created stories of terrorism in order to achieve
its ends. It has done this over and over again, leading to desired
involvement in wars, for decades.
If al Qaeda is fake, there is no war on terror. There is no main
terrorist group that we have to eradicate. And if it’s all been based on
lies, that means most of those people in GITMO are being held for false

FBI Believed that Bombs Were Used on 9/11

On 9/11, the FBI believed that bombs were involved in the attacks.

How do I know that?

Because, according to the FBI's website:

Following the massive terrorist attacks against New York and
Washington, the FBI dedicated 7,000 of its 11,000 Special Agents and
thousands of FBI support personnel to the PENTTBOM investigation.
"PENTTBOM" is short for Pentagon, Twin Towers Bombing.

(see also this and this).

Indeed, the FBI told a reporter for USA Today that FBI agents believed
there were bombs in the Twin Towers.

Similarly, the Washington Post believed that bombs were involved, as
reflected in a September 21, 2001 article containing the following phrase:

In the hours after Tuesday's bombings . . . .

Many firefighters and policemen also said there were bombs in the Twin

And perhaps "the premiere collapse expert in the country", who 9/11
Commissioner Timothy Roemer referred to as a "very, very respected
expert on building collapse", the head of the New York Fire Department's
Special Operations Command and the most highly decorated firefighter in
its NYFD history, who had previously "commanded rescue operations at
many difficult and complex disasters, including the Oklahoma City
Bombing, the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing, and many natural disasters
worldwide" thought that the collapse of the South Tower was caused by
bombs, because the collapse of the building was too even to have been
caused by anything else (pages 5-6).

But surely experts have since proven that no bombs were involved. Right?

In fact, structural engineers, architects, scientists and demolition
experts and other high-level experts have examined the evidence and
think that there were bombs.

Even the former head of the Fire Science Division of the government
agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire,
who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety
engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere)
doesn't bevelieve an adequate investigation into 9/11 has been
conducted. He has called for an independent review of the World Trade
Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a
peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I
think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I
would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done;
both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the
official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable."

After years of police and prosecutors inquiries, after a trial lasting 4
months and a 700 pages sentence, we still do not know who planned,
organized and carried out the Madrid terrorist attacks.